The Year in Letters

Books I read in 2006:

Wrecking Crew, John Albert
Ball Four, Jim Bouton
JPod, Douglas Coupland
How to Be Alone, Jonathan Franzen
The Dissident, Nell Freudenberger
Blink, Malcolm Gladwell
The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell
A Disorder Peculiar to the Country, Ken Kalfus
Sarah, JT LeRoy
Freakonomics, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner
The Last of Her Kind, Sigrid Nunez
Special Topics in Calamity Physics, Marisha Pessl
Decoding the Universe, Charles Seife
The Trouble with Physics, Lee Smolin
A Man without a Country, Kurt Vonnegut
Not Even Wrong, Peter Woit

Just started:

The Emperor's Children, Claire Messud

Recently purchased, revisiting intermittently:

They Call Me Naughty Lola -- Personal Ads from the London Review of Books, edited by David Rose

Notable:

I wrote up Charles Seife's Decoding the Universe for the CityPaper's Favorite Books of 2006 feature, which should run in the 12/28/2006 issue.

Update:

Here's a link to the aforementioned writeup of Decoding the Universe.

ASIMO over heels

A few years ago, I wrote about an upcoming appearance by Honda's ASIMO robot for the CityPaper. Today, I saw this video of ASIMO falling down a set of stairs and laughed a little. I know I'll pay once the robot overlords take over, but I just couldn't help myself.

Nullity and Nonsense

Pat found this article on the BBC site and passed it along to me. The story is about a professor of computer science at the University of Reading who thinks that by calling the result of dividing any number by zero "Nullity," he has solved a 1,200 year old math problem and fixed a programming problem that could kill people in one fell swoop. Addressing these claims in reverse order:

(A) Programmers have been using this solution for decades, and it was no big deal when it was developed in the first place -- they just called their solution "NaN" (Not a Number) instead of "Nullity."

(B) The professor's claim and the BBC's tone make it sound like naming "Nullity" is of a kind with building a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. With "Nullity," there was no problem to be solved, and a solution which simply renames an existing solution wouldn't be much of a breakthrough, anyway.

For a better explanation of the numerous problems with the BBC article in question, read this. And check out the comments on the original BBC article -- they go on and on, covering nearly every conceivable reaction: angry, funny, nasty, apologist, etc.

Pat didn't understand why dividing by zero was so problematic, so he IM'd me. I explained why (or tried to), and Pat turned our IM conversation into this post on the Clog.

The most notable part of the post, however, is in the setup preceding the IM transcript, where Pat introduces me as the Clog's Senior Math Nerd. My parents will be so proud.