Pat found
this article on the
BBC site and passed it along to me. The story is about a professor of computer science at the University of Reading who thinks that by calling the result of dividing any number by zero "Nullity," he has solved a 1,200 year old math problem and fixed a programming problem that could kill people in one fell swoop. Addressing these claims in reverse order:
(A) Programmers have been using this solution for decades, and it was no big deal when it was developed in the first place -- they just called their solution "NaN" (Not a Number) instead of "Nullity."
(B) The professor's claim and the BBC's tone make it sound like naming "Nullity" is of a kind with building
a proof of Fermat's Last Theorem. With "Nullity," there was no problem to be solved, and a solution which simply renames an existing solution wouldn't be much of a breakthrough, anyway.
For a better explanation of the numerous problems with the BBC article in question, read
this. And check out the comments on the original BBC article -- they go on and on, covering nearly every conceivable reaction: angry, funny, nasty, apologist, etc.
Pat didn't understand why dividing by zero was so problematic, so he
IM'd me. I explained why (or tried to), and Pat turned our IM conversation into
this post on the
Clog.
The most notable part of the post, however, is in the setup preceding the IM transcript, where Pat introduces me as the Clog's Senior Math Nerd. My parents will be so proud.
Labels: BBC, citypaper, clog, dividing by zero, IM, math, nonsense, nullity, pat
